PIVX PIVX

Smart Contract PlatformPrivacy

PIVX leads with its economic model and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus and currently holding a B-rateB rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-03
B70.01 / 100

Sector Rank #82 · Global Rank #115

Roadmap Delivery60.19D-
Technical Implementation64.55D
Tokenomics75.8C
Team Governance73.09C-
Market Ecosystem75.53C
Security & Compliance68.3D+
01

Overall Rating

B · 70.01 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
60.19
Technical Implementation
64.55
Tokenomics
75.8
Team Governance
73.09
Market Ecosystem
75.53
Security & Compliance
68.3
Overall Score
70.01

PIVX overall rating B (total score 70.01), ranking high in economic model, market ecosystem, and team governance across six dimensions. The main point of deduction was roadmap delivery (60.19 points)—a six-dimensional rating lower than other dimensions.

Rating team conclusion: "PIVX has relative advantages in economic model, market ecosystem, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to allocate moderate positions and continuously track subsequent improvements in weak area dimensions.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

60/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery recordsWeight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed progress on recent upgradesWeight 30%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available pending delivery milestone informationWeight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delaysWeight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Technical Implementation

66.5/100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopts a mature proof-of-stake mechanism with stable operationWeight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been operating since 2016 and has a long historyWeight 15%About 10 years · 90 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed quality assessment data for recent upgradesWeight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of specific data support for client diversityWeight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Tokenomics

73.25/100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit deflationary mechanism, fixed block rewardsWeight 30%&None · 60 / 100

Inflation rate?Fixed block rewards, inflation rates at reasonable levelsWeight 25%About 2.5% · 85 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The PoS mechanism encourages staking, but specific data is missingWeight 25%Insufficient data · 80 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no fixed supply limit, but there are fixed block rewardsWeight 20%No hardtop · 70 / 100

Team Governance

72.5/100

Core Development Team?Project data shows there are core developers, but the team is small in sizeWeight 30%The core developers are clear · 70 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Decentralized community governance is achieved through MasternodeWeight 25%Decentralized governance · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?The project has a long history and limited transparency information about fundsWeight 25%Normal · 65 / 100

Concentration of key people?Project data lists only one core developer, indicating a degree of concentrationWeight 20%Normal · 70 / 100

Market Ecosystem

73.5/100

Active Address?There is a lack of active address data, but the project has a certain market rankingWeight 30%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Operates as an independent chain, with no L2 or multi-chain ecosystemWeight 25%&None · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-DeFi projects, no relevant TVL dataWeight 25%&None · 70 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing, but project data still has followersWeight 20%Moderately active · 80 / 100

Security & Compliance

66/100

Historical Major Failure?The project has been in operation for many years without any major public safety incidentsWeight 25%No major fault records · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Privacy coins face cautious attitudes from regulators worldwideWeight 30%Somewhat cautious · 60 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on privacy coins is generally more cautiousWeight 30%Somewhat cautious · 60 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Security score codes have low safety scores and may pose potential risksWeight 15%Normal · 50 / 100

04

B Peer Comparison

Export CSV
PIVXB · 70.01VictionB · 73.33FlowB · 73.28ARKB · 73.17
Overall Score70.0173.3373.2873.17
Roadmap Delivery60.1974.572.2372.78
Technical Implementation64.5571.765.564.7
Tokenomics75.88176.376.3
Team Governance73.0972.6272.1472.8
Market Ecosystem75.5369.8575.8374
Security & Compliance68.371.6274.8675.79

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions