Steem STEEM

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed information about the last four upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestone plan.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature DPoS mechanism with high efficiency.Weight 30%DPoS (Mature) · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running stably for ten years, with a long history.Weight 15%10 years · 95 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed quality assessments of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%to be on the low side · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The STEEM token does not have a direct deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%No direct deflation · 40 / 100

Inflation rate?Precise inflation rate data is lacking, but persistent inflation is known.Weight 25%Insufficient data (persistent inflation) · 50 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a Steem Power staking system, but the exact staking rate is unknown.Weight 25%Insufficient data (staking presented) · 60 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict upper limit on the supply of STEEM tokens.Weight 20%No upper limit · 30 / 100

Core Development Team?GitHub has low activity and low security and governance strength.Weight 30%Low activity · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?DPoS governance mechanisms face centralization risks and low security scores.Weight 25%DPoS (Centralization Risk) · 45 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of transparent fund data and historical controversy.Weight 25%Insufficient data (disputed) · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Historical events indicate a high concentration of key figures or entities.Weight 20%Slightly high · 35 / 100

Active Address?Lack of active address data, but community trust is decent.Weight 30%Insufficient data (moderate) · 60 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As an L1 without L2, but with a certain number of DApps.Weight 25%No L2 (about 60+ applications) · 65 / 100

DeFi TVL?Steem is not a DeFi platform, so TVL is negligible.Weight 25%None (non-DeFi platforms) · 20 / 100

Developer community?GitHub's activity data is low, and the developer community size is limited.Weight 20%Low activity · 40 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Lack of major technical fault records, safety score is average.Weight 25%No major technical failures · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?A lack of clear regulatory stance and potential compliance risks exist.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?The lack of a clear SEC stance raises potential securities identification risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency, but the project runs stably.Weight 15%Insufficient data (low level) · 70 / 100