二层网络 板块

Cointelegraph · @Cointelegraph

@Cointelegraph · 2.9M 粉丝

中性

⚡ INSIGHT: Arbitrum says Robinhood Chain had no downtime, just brief batch-posting delays and a minor feed slowdown for some providers. https://t.co/S2aJHB3lQu

Ash Crypto · @AshCrypto

@AshCrypto · 2.1M 粉丝

看多

Altcoins just broke above $200B after weeks of going sideways. As long as it holds this level, the short-term picture looks bullish. https://t.co/q7Ihq7cCqU

Brian Armstrong · @brian_armstrong

@brian_armstrong · 1.8M 粉丝

看多

Cool to see capital formation starting to work on Base I've long believed this could be more efficient onchain

Crypto Rover · @cryptorover

@cryptorover · 1.6M 粉丝

看多

💥BREAKING: Robinhood DEX Volume hits a new all-time high of $3,700,000,000. Insane growth. https://t.co/h1eTpzPRTX

Alexis Ohanian 🗽 · @alexisohanian

@alexisohanian · 614.7K 粉丝

看多

Another record-breaker for my friends at @altxyzofficial and now I wanna see where this Kobe/Lebron card ends https://t.co/ictioyzWIH https://t.co/v5cwVX7pEY

Wu Blockchain · @WuBlockchain

@WuBlockchain · 557.2K 粉丝

中性

Offchain Labs and Solana Co-Founders Debate Robinhood Chain Fee Model Offchain Labs co-founder Steven Goldfeder and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko debated Robinhood Chain’s fee model. Yakovenko said the 10% revenue share paid to Arbitrum would have been enough to cover Solana transaction fees four times over, allowing Robinhood to offer users a fully gasless experience. Goldfeder called that a “ridiculous take,” saying Robinhood keeps about 90% of gas fees on Arbitrum, whereas on Solana it would retain none of the base-layer fees and would have to subsidize user fees out of pocket. “Robinhood chose Arbitrum so they could be a landlord and not a tenant,” he wrote. Yakovenko argued that Robinhood could charge users at the frontend while lowering costs by using a cheaper backend. Goldfeder replied that most of the fees are generated by activity that does not pass through Robinhood’s frontend. If Robinhood were merely a tenant on another chain, he said, it would capture none of that ancillary activity, even if it had brought those users there.