Lisk LSK

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, with no significant upgrades and deliveries.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an Optimistic Rollup, it inherits Ethereum's security.Weight 30%Optimistic Rollup (Ethereum Security) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The Lisk Layer 2 mainnet has been running for about 1.5 years, giving the project a long history.Weight 15%Approximately 1.5 years (L2 mainnet) · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recent development activity is zero, with no obvious upgrade information.Weight 35%No obvious recent upgrades · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data means L2 clients usually have limited diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data (possibly single) · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism was found, and there is a risk of issuance.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has the right to issue additional issues, which carries extremely high inflation risk.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?LSK tokens have no obvious staking or lock data.Weight 25%Approximately 0% (LSK tokens) · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a theoretical upper limit, the permission to issue additional rights makes it unreliable.Weight 20%Permission to issue additional rights exists · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with good backgrounds.Weight 30%The core team is open and transparent · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Early L2 governance may be more centralized, but the security score is relatively high.Weight 25%Centralized (Early L2) · 50 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Relatively high · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holdings are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%Extremely high · 5 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%Normal · 55.8 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a L2, Lisk is part of the Optimism Superchain ecosystem.Weight 25%1 (Lisk L2) + Superchain · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi TVL is moderate, with room for growth.Weight 25%approximately $35.6 million · 40 / 100

Developer community?Lack of GitHub activity data makes it difficult to assess developer community activity.Weight 20%Insufficient data (missing GitHub activity) · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety score: The safety rating is relatively high, with no publicly disclosed major fault records.Weight 25%No major public faults · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As L2s, regulatory attitudes are usually neutral, with no clear positive or negative effects.Weight 30%Neutral · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?As L2s, the likelihood of being recognized as securities by the SEC is relatively low.Weight 30%Neutral (Non-Security Presumption) · 50 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes assessment difficult.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100