Maverick Protocol MAV
Maverick Protocol stands out thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus and currently holding a D+ rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-05
D+33.67 / 100
Sector Rank #314 · Global Rank #744
Overall Rating
D+ · 33.67 / 100Roadmap Delivery
22.5
Tokenomics
41.25
Team Governance
66.57
Market Ecosystem
57.93
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
33.67
Maverick Protocol has an overall rating D+f D (total score 34.84), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Maverick Protocol has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
50/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestone data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery details, making it impossible to assess its progress.Weight 30%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of project delays.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
59/100Consensus Mechanism?As a DeFi protocol, security depends on the underlying public chain it deploys.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for over two years, accumulating considerable operational experience.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about the quality and impact of the recent upgrade.Weight 35%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?As a DeFi protocol, it does not directly involve client diversity.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
43/100Deflationary Mechanism?Contracts have additional issuance rights, and deflationary mechanisms are unclear or insufficient.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Inflation rate?A large number of token unlocks will occur in the future, putting pressure on market circulation.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?A lack of clear staking or lock-up data may lead to excessive liquidity.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, which helps stabilize its long-term value.Weight 20%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Team Governance
67.5/100Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly disclosed, supported by well-known VCs, and have strong backgrounds.Weight 30%75 / 100 · 75 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Security score: Governance strength rating: moderate, but decentralization needs improvement.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Financial Transparency?Medium transparency rating, total financing amount public.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold too high a proportion of coins, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Market Ecosystem
67.45/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses performed well, indicating high user engagement.Weight 30%82 / 100 · 81.5 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
DeFi TVL?The total value locked in DeFi is at a moderate level, with room for growth.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Developer community?Data on GitHub development activity is missing, and the activity level of developer communities is questionable.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
25/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Contracts have permission to issue additional contracts, triggering safety red lines, and regulatory oversight is rather cautious.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The contract has rights to issue additional securities, which may be considered securities by the SEC, posing high compliance risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lacks data on client bug frequency, but its security score is moderate.Weight 15%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
D+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV| Maverick ProtocolD+ · 33.67 |  wojakD+ · 39.93 |  Polyhedra NetworkD+ · 39.91 |  yesnoerrorD+ · 39.9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 33.67 | 39.93 | 39.91 | 39.9 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 22.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 41.25 | 23.58 | 41.25 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 66.57 | 30 | 75.16 | 34.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 57.93 | 70 | 70.72 | 71.33 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 50.54 | 0 | 58.05 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.