Siren SIREN

BNB Chain EcosystemAI agentMEMEAI

Siren leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently firmly holding a C- rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-03
C-45.2 / 100

Sector Rank #98 · Global Rank #328

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics17.64F
Team Governance57.2E+
Market Ecosystem70C-
Security & Compliance60.5D-
01

Overall Rating

C- · 45.2 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
17.64
Team Governance
57.2
Market Ecosystem
70
Security & Compliance
60.5
Overall Score
45.2

Siren has an overall rating C-f C (total 45.2), ranking highly in six dimensions for market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "Siren has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and team governance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery data makes it impossible to assess achievement.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

54/100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on BNB Smart Chain, it adopts a mature PoSA consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoSA (BNB Chain) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed its initial phase.Weight 15%About 1.2 years · 50 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information about recent upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokens on the BNB Chain, client diversity depends on the BNB Chain.Weight 20%Medium (relying on BNB Chain) · 60 / 100

Tokenomics

25.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a large amount of uncirculated supply, and there will be significant inflationary pressure in the future.Weight 25%Potential inflation exists (about 37.6%) · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of staking or hedging data, and existing data indicate a very low hedging ratio.Weight 25%Insufficient/very low data · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%1 billion · 90 / 100

Team Governance

34.5/100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited information and may face the risk of concentration.Weight 30%Less or more concentrated · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There are governance mechanisms, but the degree of decentralization is questionable and may be somewhat centralized.Weight 25%Controversial / Centralized · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of treasury wallet information limits fund transparency assessment.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 30 / 100

Concentration of key people?Limited information on core team members poses a risk of key personnel concentration.Weight 20%Slightly high · 40 / 100

Market Ecosystem

41.5/100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, indicating high market activity.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on BNB Smart Chain, with only a single ecosystem.Weight 25%Single (BNB Chain) · 20 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a meme coin, lacking direct DeFi TVL data, it is expected to be extremely low.Weight 25%Insufficient/very low data · 10 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and codebases.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 20 / 100

Security & Compliance

51.5/100

Historical Major Failure?Safety Score: Safety rating: Good, with no major historical faults found.Weight 25%None (Safety Rating BBB) · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory guidance, and the overall regulatory environment is rather cautious.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?As a meme coin, its securities nature may be controversial.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

04

C- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
SirenC- · 45.2DODOC- · 46.61BasenjiC- · 46.54OKZOOC- · 46.47
Overall Score45.246.6146.5446.47
Roadmap Delivery003037.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics17.6466.7924.531.07
Team Governance57.290.3751.656.4
Market Ecosystem7091.655.0167.44
Security & Compliance60.5060.4560.5

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions