Venom VENOM

Smart Contract PlatformInfrastructureLayer1

Venom leads in economic models and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently firmly holding an E+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-01
E+16.58 / 100

Sector Rank #310 · Global Rank #1888

Roadmap Delivery11.25F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics41.25F
Team Governance19.29F
Market Ecosystem18.04F
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

E+ · 16.58 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
41.25
Team Governance
19.29
Market Ecosystem
18.04
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
16.58

Venom Overall Rating E+ (total 16.62), ranking high in economic model, team governance, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.

Rating Team Conclusion: "Venom has relative advantages in economic model, team governance, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

33/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent concrete upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Technical Implementation

51/100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopt a mature proof-of-stake consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proof of Stake) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed the initial stage.Weight 15%About 2 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Tokenomics

38.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but its strength is average.Weight 30%There is a destruction mechanism · 50 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a large number of unlocked tokens, facing significant inflationary pressure in the short term.Weight 25%There is potential high inflation · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is large.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%8 billion · 80 / 100

Team Governance

24.79/100

Core Development Team?The core team lacks experience in serial entrepreneurship, and VC endorsements are average.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 19.3 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Lack of transparency in governance mechanisms and data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public transparency in fund usage.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract has the right to issue additional items, and the owner can change the balance.Weight 20%Risk of centralization · 20 / 100

Market Ecosystem

19.2/100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is average.Weight 30%Average · 39 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a new public chain, the number of ecosystem integrations is still limited.Weight 25%In the early stages of ecological construction · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?There is a lack of specific data on DeFi TVL on Venom.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Developer community?Developer activity trends are sluggish, and community activity is insufficient.Weight 20%Low activity · 0 / 100

Security & Compliance

22/100

Historical Major Failure?The mainnet has been running for a short time, with no publicly available records of major security incidents.Weight 25%No public records are available · 70 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing regulatory risks of being treated as securities.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing regulatory risks of being treated as securities.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

04

E+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
VenomE+ · 16.58Main Street USDE+ · 19.99SubQuery NetworkE+ · 19.98GoGoPoolE+ · 19.98
Overall Score16.5819.9919.9819.98
Roadmap Delivery11.2537.53037.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics41.2501.5628
Team Governance19.293052.868.32
Market Ecosystem18.0445.9536.531.02
Security & Compliance0000

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions