Login
Sign Up
The Bank of England is actively reconsidering specific components of its proposed regulatory framework for pound sterling stablecoins following urgent warnings from digital asset firms. Industry participants argue that stringent holding caps and reserve requirements threaten to stifle adoption and render UK-issued tokens economically unviable. Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden confirmed to the Financial Times that the central bank is exploring alternatives to temporary limits on stablecoin holdings for individuals and businesses.
Concurrently, regulators are examining whether the mandate requiring at least 40% of backing assets to be held as non-interest-bearing deposits at the Bank of England is excessively conservative. This strategic pivot occurs as the UK government and regulators attempt to position Britain as a competitive global hub for digital assets while simultaneously containing risks to bank funding and financial stability. Sterling-pegged tokens currently represent a negligible fraction of the approximately $300 billion global stablecoin market, which remains overwhelmingly dominated by dollar-based issuers.
The Bank of England originally detailed these ownership limits in its November 2025 consultation paper regarding a proposed regime for systemic stablecoins denominated in sterling. These proposals built upon options first introduced in a 2023 discussion paper. Under the initial framework, individuals would face a restriction of holding up to 20,000 pounds, roughly equivalent to $27,000, of any single UK stablecoin. Businesses would be capped at approximately $13.5 million during an initial transition period. The central bank justified these limits as necessary measures to prevent a sudden outflow of deposits from commercial banks into new forms of tokenized money should a large stablecoin achieve rapid adoption for payments.
However, industry groups and prospective issuers have countered that these caps are operationally cumbersome, difficult to supervise across multiple platforms, and likely to deter serious institutional use in critical areas such as corporate treasury, payroll, and settlement.
Sarah Breeden has historically been one of the most cautious voices within the Bank of England regarding stablecoin regulation. In November 2025, she warned that diluting the rules too significantly could damage financial stability, emphasizing that stablecoins are money-like instruments that must be at least as safe and robust as existing payments infrastructure. At that time, she supported stringent liquidity requirements that would force stablecoin issuers to park large portions of their reserves at the central bank while holding the remainder in high-quality liquid securities such as UK government bonds. Law firms and potential issuers argue that such a structure would significantly compress profit margins and make UK stablecoin issuance far less attractive compared to operating under United States or European Union regimes. Woofun AI notes that this divergence in regulatory philosophy creates a complex landscape for cross-border capital allocation.
The shift in tone highlights how UK policymakers are still navigating toward a middle ground on stablecoins as global regulatory approaches continue to diverge. In January, UK lawmakers opened an inquiry into the optimal methods for overseeing fiat-backed tokens, taking evidence from industry participants including Coinbase and Innovate Finance.
Meanwhile, the Bank of England and the Treasury continue to refine a framework intended to sit alongside broader crypto rules and potential digital pound plans. A more flexible approach to caps and backing requirements could determine whether systemic GBP stablecoins emerge as serious competitors to dollar-pegged rivals in cross-border payments and onshore crypto markets. Alternatively, activity may remain concentrated in jurisdictions perceived as more accommodating to innovation. Woofun AI analysis suggests that the final regulatory outcome will be a decisive factor in the UK's ability to capture market share in the evolving digital asset ecosystem.